-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dot conflicts with graphviz dot program #14
Comments
I also came here to say the exact same thing. I love that there are new programs and new creativity, please let's be creative and invent a new name, so there is no naming conflict. unfortunately, I have no suggestions, what about "dotfiles" ? |
There's already a dotfile manager named dotfiles. |
Agreed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphviz is installed on all my machines. The binary is generally Could anything destructive happen, theoretically, if somebody tried to invoke your For your convenience:
...where "dot files" are plain text documents which contain ALGOL-like syntax (and sometimes an embedded SGML-like syntax). |
Thanks for report the problem. I currently don't have any idea for a new project name, but I'd like to change it as soon as it is decided (the renaming will do at the same time as the CI migration). Note: since |
|
I don't think including the language (Rust) in the name is a good idea, since the choice of language does not really matter or differentiate this project from others. |
How about |
Looks like |
How about |
|
Or it could be |
In relation to void-linux/void-packages#20679 (comment): Is there a timescale planned for the rename? It would be nice to not have to rename the package after adding later on, so it would be helpful to get get some more info. |
One of the things I like about this project is that it's based on symbolic links. I propose the name I reserved it on crates.io 😉 |
dot is a very widely used command already for the graphviz program
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: