Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use with CyTOF data? #8

Open
ashipde opened this issue Apr 19, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Use with CyTOF data? #8

ashipde opened this issue Apr 19, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@ashipde
Copy link

ashipde commented Apr 19, 2020

Can we use BERMUDA for mass cytometry (CyTOF) data? Unlike scRNA seq. data, CyTOF data may have only 20-40 variables (markers).

@txWang
Copy link
Owner

txWang commented May 4, 2020

Hi,

The intuition of BERMUDA, which is using domain adaptation to align similar cell clusters across different batches, should work on CyTOF data. However, the design of the whole BERMUDA pipeline is for scRNAseq data and we only tested the method on scRNAseq data in our paper. There are several potential issues I could think of when trying to apply BERMUDA to CyTOF data.

  1. We used Seurat to identify cell clusters and select highly variable genes. I think with 20-40 markers, you don't necessarily need to identify highly variable genes. However, I haven't tried Seurat on cell cluster identification using CyTOF data.
  2. We used MetaNeighbor to identify similar clusters across different batches. I am not sure if their method will work on CyTOF data.
  3. Since you are working with a lot fewer variables, you might want to adjust the default network in BERMUDA to a smaller network, but the design of losses should work fine.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants