You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My understanding is that there is no formal spec for base62, but that the "glowfall" implementation (despite its lack of stars) has become the de facto implementation (used the most across the most repos).
Does this follow that spec? Or a different one? Or create a new one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Have not heard of glowfall before. This library implements mathematical byte by byte base conversion of arbitrary data. There is really only one way to do it. Standards such as base85 which has extra rules for compressing spaces etc are not pure base conversions.
By default this library uses 0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz as character set. It is the same as The GNU Multiple Precision Arithmetic Library uses. GMP has been around since early 1990's. I personally like this character set most since the encoded base62 strings preserve the sort order of the encoded values
My understanding is that there is no formal spec for base62, but that the "glowfall" implementation (despite its lack of stars) has become the de facto implementation (used the most across the most repos).
Does this follow that spec? Or a different one? Or create a new one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: