You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I guess JSON is passed to uglifyjs as JS and there it's understood as a variable (Array/Object)
where '"' is valid, but not in JSON.
There is an old discussion: mishoo/UglifyJS#156
Seems like there is no interest in adding the support. But it's old and now I see:
-p, --parse <options> ...
`expression` Parse a single expression, rather than
a program (for parsing JSON).
`spidermonkey` Assume input files are SpiderMonkey
AST format (as JSON).
but I didn't look further.
The thing is, that the standard JSON.stringify works really good. JSON.stringify(Sites, null, "\t")
outputs a nice beautified JSON.
Would you thing about adding an option to minjson and subsequently to Sublime Editor to use JSON instead of UglifyJS for minjson?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A data in single quotes then fails as valid JSON.
I guess JSON is passed to uglifyjs as JS and there it's understood as a variable (Array/Object)
where
'"'
is valid, but not in JSON.There is an old discussion:
mishoo/UglifyJS#156
Seems like there is no interest in adding the support. But it's old and now I see:
but I didn't look further.
The thing is, that the standard JSON.stringify works really good.
JSON.stringify(Sites, null, "\t")
outputs a nice beautified JSON.
Would you thing about adding an option to minjson and subsequently to Sublime Editor to use JSON instead of UglifyJS for minjson?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: