-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
README
53 lines (40 loc) · 1.97 KB
/
README
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
******************************** WORK IN PROGRESS ****************************
******************************************************************************
This project attempts to automate spell checking for comments in Go code. Most
modern languages rely on comments for documentation, and I was curious to see
to what degree this can be automated. It's split into a few packages:
1) Package "check" contains generic logic for spell checking given an alphabet
and dictionary. It works as a standalone spell checking package.
2) Package "lang" store dictionary data and currently only supports
English(US).
3) Package "scrape" has logic to scrape data from Merriam-Webster's online
dictionary.
4) Package "main" builds a binary to run predefined or tunable spell checkers
against specific files or recursively on a directory. Java, C, C++, and
Scala files are also supported, with the default being Go.
So what's considered a misspelling?
Since comments are often code expressions and not valid grammar, it's not
rational to simply check each space-delimited string against a dictionary.
The default behavior classifies a misspelled word if it:
- has at least 5 characters
and
- differs by 1 character insertion
or
- differs by 1 character deletion
or
- differs by a single consecutive character swap
To run the classifier on a Go project:
$ ./gospell .
There's minimal tuning support. To classify against words that:
- are at least 4 characters long
and
- differ by at most 2 insertions:
Try:
$ ./gospell -ml=4 -mi=2 .
This is a decent start. Results often need pruning by a human eye. It may be
worth exploring the following features:
-- the frequency of a misspelled word wherein some threshold
declassifies the misspelling
-- adapt the insertion, deletion, and swap restrictions
based on the size of the word,
so longer words can differ by more changes.