New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

crypto: unwieldy API for bls aggregate_* functions #21

Open

emturner opened this issue Mar 1, 2023 · 0 comments

Collaborator

emturner commented Mar 1, 2023

Currently, aggregate_signature takes a &[&BlsSignature], where a &[BlsSignature] would work just as well.

Could this (and aggregate_verify) have improved APIs for use here?

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment