quick fixes for compatibility and search problem #44
+6
−6
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Line 714: The idea here is to only catch keys if they are a `:BIBTEX-KEY:` property or at the start of an org-mode headline. Someone familiar with using regexps in org-mode could do this much better. Lines 716-718: I don't see `outline-hide-other` and `outline-show-subtree` defined in Emacs 24.3.1. I'm not sure what the side-effects of this change may be.
|
I'm realizing that this definitely needs to be a |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Line 714: The idea here is to only catch keys if they are a
:BIBTEX-KEY:property or at the start of an org-mode headline. Someone familiar with using regexps in org-mode could do this much better.Lines 716-718: I don't see
outline-hide-otherandoutline-show-subtreedefined in Emacs 24.3.1. I'm not sure if my change will behave differently, but it seems OK so far.