You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current interface for interacting with palettes is by wrapping each one in a scale.
I dislike this for the following reasons:
It expanded the number of scale functions in ggplot2 beyond modesty (do we really need continuous, discrete and binned variants of every palette?).
It encourages developers of palette packages to model their interface after ggplot2's interface.
It is no good reverting the scales we already have, but we may yet prevent wildgrowth of future scale functions. The proposal is to make the palette argument in scales more accessible to users, by for example:
Directly expose the palette argument in some scale functions
This palette argument would then accept:
A function, as it does currently
A keyword, like "viridis" or "okabe-ito"
A vector of values that can be translated to a function
Abstract away the distinction between discrete and continuous palettes.
A user shouldn't have to worry about this
Auto-translate discrete palettes to continuous ones
Auto-translate continuous palettes to discrete ones
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current interface for interacting with palettes is by wrapping each one in a scale.
I dislike this for the following reasons:
It is no good reverting the scales we already have, but we may yet prevent wildgrowth of future scale functions. The proposal is to make the
palette
argument in scales more accessible to users, by for example:palette
argument in some scale functionspalette
argument would then accept:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: