Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kitti dataset preprocess without images #43

Open
DJNing opened this issue Mar 10, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Kitti dataset preprocess without images #43

DJNing opened this issue Mar 10, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@DJNing
Copy link

DJNing commented Mar 10, 2022

Since this is a Lidar-only object detection model, could we preprocess the data without the images? I think if we don't use the evaluation metric of 'bbox', we can ignore the infos from images, right?

Another question is, why do we only count the points inside the gt in the FOV of the image?

@tianweiy
Copy link
Owner

Since this is a Lidar-only object detection model, could we preprocess the data without the images? I think if we don't use the evaluation metric of 'bbox', we can ignore the infos from images, right?

I think so ?

Another question is, why do we only count the points inside the gt in the FOV of the image?
only these boxes are annotated

@DJNing
Copy link
Author

DJNing commented Mar 16, 2022

Thanks for the reply, I think I've made it work now. One more question, how to change the number of target classes for the network? Can I just change the CLASS_NAMES in the network YAML directly?

@tianweiy
Copy link
Owner

yeah, i think this should work

@francescofact
Copy link

Thanks for the reply, I think I've made it work now. One more question, how to change the number of target classes for the network? Can I just change the CLASS_NAMES in the network YAML directly?

How did you managed to preprocess the kitti dataset without the calibration images? I also have a lidar only dataset

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants