You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is the example found in open_intent_detection/examples/run_DA-ADB.sh meant to reproduce the published results? Running this and comparing to ADB gives significantly worse results. I took a look to see why this is briefly but didn't find an obvious answer.
The average of ADB across the experiments gave 84% and DA-ADB gave 47%
Example of ADB results from which averages of Acc where calculated
The only change was the location of the bert model in hyper-parameters which was the same for both methods:
'bert_model': "bert-base-uncased",
Instead of: 'bert_model': "/home/sharing/disk1/pretrained_embedding/bert/uncased_L-12_H-768_A-12/",
Thanks for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The following is my reproduction of the results. The DA-ADB result is generally higher than that of ADB, so there is nothing wrong with our model. The only difference is that the position of the bert model I use in the hyperparameter is
“uncased_L-12_H-768_A-12”.
Could it be a bert version issue? You can give it a try uncased_L-12_H-768_A-12
Is the example found in open_intent_detection/examples/run_DA-ADB.sh meant to reproduce the published results? Running this and comparing to ADB gives significantly worse results. I took a look to see why this is briefly but didn't find an obvious answer.
The average of ADB across the experiments gave 84% and DA-ADB gave 47%
Example of ADB results from which averages of Acc where calculated
The only change was the location of the bert model in hyper-parameters which was the same for both methods:
'bert_model': "bert-base-uncased",
Instead of: 'bert_model': "/home/sharing/disk1/pretrained_embedding/bert/uncased_L-12_H-768_A-12/",
Thanks for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: