Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should synthesized NAT64 addresses be preferred over native IPv4? #42

Open
furry13 opened this issue Mar 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Should synthesized NAT64 addresses be preferred over native IPv4? #42

furry13 opened this issue Mar 18, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@furry13
Copy link
Contributor

furry13 commented Mar 18, 2024

This is an open question I do not have an answer for yet - I guess the arguments can be made for both approaches..

So if an IPv6-mostly network provides DNS64, then a dual-stack host talking to an IPv4-only destination would have a choice between:

  • a synthesized IPv6 address which will be routed via NAT64
  • a native IPv4 path

(we have a similar discussion in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-link-v6ops-claton/: shall CLAT be enabled if both PLAT and IPv4 are available?)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant