Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Look into matmul transpose - using enums instead of bools and fusing the work into matmul #12342

Open
bbradelTT opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@bbradelTT
Copy link
Contributor

At some point transpose parameters were added to ttnn.matmul and ttnn.linear with the hope of fusing the transpose or just using the transposed data.

This issue is to look into:

  • using enums instead of bools and
  • instead of using transpose, just have the work be done inside of matmul (either by transposing internally or reading in transposed values)

Alternatively

  • the parameters could be removed.
@marty1885
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, just want to chime in on the context. I think this feature was added as one of my feature requests (#9709). It is a part of the feature set needed to improve performance of the Metalium backend on GGML as GGML uses pre-transposed weights.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants