Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tagging a specific timespan #160

Open
Magnusgaertner opened this issue Oct 28, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Tagging a specific timespan #160

Magnusgaertner opened this issue Oct 28, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@Magnusgaertner
Copy link

Hey,

would it be possible to adapt the tagging framework such that one can not only annotate a whole bag file as such but a specific timespan within the bag?

Best,
Magnus

@danthony06
Copy link
Contributor

It might be possible. I think there could be some corner cases to think about, because the messages aren't necessarily written in the bag in strict time order, which could cause problems.

@pjreed
Copy link
Contributor

pjreed commented Nov 2, 2021

Out of curiosity, what's the use case for this? How would you imagine it working and what would it be useful for?

@Magnusgaertner
Copy link
Author

The use-case would be a relatively long bag, with certain short events that one needs to locate quickly.

I think my main takeaway is that this requested feature is indirectly already available through topics from which tags can be extracted. In this case, the time information is not visible through the detail view directly but is present when investigating the dataset through the annotation topic itself. Yet, say you have something interesting in a bag at time x, you might wish to annotate this time as metadata through the web interface to let others find the interesting part quickly.

As a no-code solution, one could (miss-)use the key-value tags to have the value of a tag hold the timestamp information.

Thank you for the great work :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants