README.md

Audio Super-Resolution

A project focused on the super-resolution of audio signals i.e improving sound quality of a digital recording, be it a vocal recording or music.

Dataset

The datasets used will be VCTK and some music dataset, possibly MagnaTagATune or The Million Song dataset.

Main references

• Audio Super-Resolution Using Neural Nets
• Time-frequency Networks For Audio Super-Resolution
• Bandwidth extension on raw audio via generative adversarial networks

MSc research project

Papers

• Phase-aware music super-resolution using generative adversarial networks

• A two-stage U-Net for high-fidelity denoising of historical recordings

• Realistic Gramophone Noise Synthesis Using A Diffusion Model

• BEHM-GAN: Bandwidth Extension of Historical Music using Generative Adversarial Networks

• Learning to denoise historical music

• SDR – half-baked or well done?

• Objective Measures of Perceptual Audio Quality Reviewed: An Evaluation of Their Application Domain Dependence

• MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications

Data augmentation

• Imaging Time-Series to Improve Classification and Imputation

• Data augmentation for audio - Medium

• Data augmentation approaches for improving animal audio classification

• Audiomentations - Python library for audio data augmentation

Data transformation

• Digital audio antiquing - Signal processing methods for imitating the sound quality of historical recordings

Other resources

• How to upgrade Colab with more compute instances?

• Different types of convolutional layers

• Introduction to diffusion models for machine learning

Data

• Learning Features of Music from Scratch

• MusicNet - Kaggle

• Phonobase : Early Gramophone Records and Phonograph Cylinders On-line Database

Related papers that could be used as references

Audio signals

• Deep Learning for Audio Signal Processing
• Adversarial Training for Speech Super-Resolution
• MidiNet: A Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network for Symbolic-domain Music Generation
• On the evaluation of generative models in music
• INCO-GAN: Variable-Length Music Generation Method Based on Inception Model-Based Conditional GAN
• WSRGlow: A Glow-based Waveform Generative Model for Audio Super-Resolution
• Self-Attention for Audio Super-Resolution
• On Filter Generalization for Music Bandwidth Extension Using Deep Neural Networks
• NU-Wave: A Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Neural Audio Upsampling
• Temporal FiLM: Capturing Long-Range Sequence Dependencies with Feature-Wise Modulation
• Learning Continuous Representation of Audio for Arbitrary Scale Super Resolution
• An investigation of pre-upsampling generative modelling and Generative Adversarial Networks in audio super resolution
• TUNet: A Block-online Bandwidth Extension Model based on Transformers and Self-supervised Pretraining
• Vision-Infused Deep Audio Inpainting
• VoiceFixer: Toward General Speech Restoration with Neural Vocoder
• Sound field reconstruction in rooms: inpainting meets super-resolution
• High-quality Speech Synthesis Using Super-resolution Mel-Spectrogram
• Enabling Real-time On-chip Audio Super Resolution for Bone Conduction Microphones
• Speech bandwidth expansion based on Deep Neural Networks
• Speech Audio Super-Resolution For Speech Recognition
• WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio

Image super-resolution

• Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network
• Multi-Scale Inception Based Super-Resolution Using Deep Learning Approach

Time-series

• Imaging Time-Series to Improve Classification and Imputation
• Use of recurrence plots for identification and extraction of patterns in humpback whale song recordings
• A Brief Introduction to Nonlinear Time Series Analysis and Recurrence Plots

Generative models

• Wasserstein GANs
• Neural Photo Editing with Introspective Adversarial Networks

Deep Learning

• Understanding the Disharmony between Dropout and Batch Normalization by Variance Shift
• Fast Fourier Convolution
• Competitive Multi-scale Convolution
• Efficient and Generic 1D Dilated Convolution Layer for Deep Learning
• Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Networks for Time Series Classification
• Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning
• Article on normalizing the root mean square error
• Understanding the Inception architecture
• Ordering of batch normalization and dropout

Blogs

• Using Deep-Learning to Reconstruct High-Resolution Audio
• Separate Music Tracks with Deep Learning
• A Simple Guide to the Versions of the Inception Network

Datasets

• The Million Song Dataset

Other

• Ablation studies video
• What is an ablation study?
• Steps to start training your custom Tensorflow model in AWS SageMaker
• Loss suddenly increasing
• NaN loss
• Gradient clipping in Keras
• How to use Learning Curves to Diagnose Machine Learning Model Performance
• Validation Error less than training error
• How to successfully add large data sets to Google Drive
• Signal-to-noise ratio
• Validation loss when using Dropout
• My validation loss is lower than my training loss, should I get rid of regularization?
• Dropout rate guidance for hidden layers in a convolution neural network
• Your validation loss is lower than the training loss? This is why.
• Dropout makes performance worse
• How many concurrent requests does a single Flask process receive?
• Python: How to create a zip archive from multiple files
• Java - How to download a zip file from a URL

Possible uses

• Improving sound quality of music
  • insanely experimental and slightly unrealistic idea: use Deezer's model for separating tracks of a song and apply transfer learning to upsample each track separately (train a model with low-res/high-res guitar tracks, one with bass tracks, one for drums and another for voice tracks)
• Voice-over-IP applications
• Improving speech recognition
• Remastering audio from old movies
• Reconstructing old phonograph recordings (This one might be a bit far-fetched, since a lot of data is needed. It might actually be impossible.)

Converting a spectrogram to audio (might be useful later)

The Python module librosa can transform an audio signal into a spectrogram and vice-versa by using the Griffin-Lim algorithm.

Math and signal processing links

• What is convolution? This is the easiest way to understand
• Introducing Convolutions
• Valerio Velardo's Audio Signal Processing for Machine Learning Playlist
• Steve Brunton's Fourier Analysis Playlist
• Sampling, Aliasing & Nyquist Theorem
• Interpolation
• Wave phase
• What is phase in audio?
• Difference between logged-power spectrum and power spectrum
• Linear and logarithmic scales
• Decibel conversion
• Why do we modulate signals?
• Modulation vs. convolution
• Discrete Fourier Transform explained with example
• DC offset
• The FFT algorithm - simple step by step explanation
• What is a good signal-to-noise ratio?
• Log-uniform distribution

Research advices

• How to Read AI (Audio) Research Papers Like a Rockstar

  1. Skimming

     • read the abstract
     • read introduction + conclusion
     • check out figures and tables
     • ignore details

  2. Reading the details

     • What's the state-of-the-art?
     • What are the tools/techniques used?
     • How did the authors evaluate their solution?
     • What are the results of the experiments?

  3. Question everything

     • Do I understand everything the authors say?
     • Is the paper sound?
     • What would I have done differently?
     • Read referenced research papers
     • Internalise the math
     • Re-think the problem
     • Explain the paper to friends/colleagues

  4. Check the code

     • Check the author's implementation
     • Re-implement the proposed solution
     • Run experiments

• How to Conduct Literature Review Effectively

  Select resource → Read resource → Take notes (topic, approach, results, contributions, limitations/weaknesses) → Keep track of reference → Summarise literature review findings

• How to Select AI (Audio) Papers Effectively

• How to Summarize a Research Article

Outline idea

• Introduction

  • Problem statement (what, why, how)

• Theory

  • Neural nets/CNNs
  • Image super-resolution
  • Time series super-resolution
  • Autoencoders and U-Nets (state-of-the-art) - Audio super-resolution - literature review
  • Time-series analysis - basic concepts (frequency spectrum, Fourier transform, spectrograms, sample rate)

• My contributions

  • Multiscale convolutions or
  • Encoding the time-domain representation as images (GAFs, MTFs, recurrence plots or some other time-series imaging technique)

• Experiments and results evaluation (metrics, tables etc.) -> dataset details (exploratory data analysis: histograms, spectrograms etc.)

• Spring/Angular project description

• Conclusion

A quick implementation of "Audio Super Resolution Using Neural Networks (Kuleshov, Enam, Ermon, 2017)"

First stage

• Write the data generator scripts (obtaining the low-res/high-res pairs of audio clips)
• Write the training/testing scripts
• read more about why the loss approaches the nan value during training
  • usually, it is either because of an exploding gradient or a vanishing gradient (in my case, I accidentally used NRMSE as a loss function instead of using it only as a metric, the number was so small that Keras displayed the loss as being "nan")
  • relevant StackOverflow post: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37232782/nan-loss-when-training-regression-network
• create plots with the training and validation loss
• train 100 epochs
• adjust the data split to use all of the generated data from the first 100 tracks of VCTK for training/validation/testing
• Finish testing/prediction script:
  • Downsample test audio track
  • Feed chunks of 256 samples of the audio to the model
  • Display spectrogram of the output
  • Save the low-res/high-res/super-res numpy arrays as audio and compare them

Second stage

• Display the 5-number summary / boxplot of the generated dataset
• Create line plot of a couple of random samples (both in time-domain and in frequency-domain)
• Create histogram of a single sample
• Check what size a chunk could have (transform the numpy array chunk of size n to WAV and listen to the result)
• Implement checkpoint restoration
• Generate the dataset again with a chunk size of 4800 samples (100ms), an overlap of 2400 samples (50ms) and a downsampling factor of 4 (the reason for this patch size is that the paper mentions a similar size of 6000 samples used in 400 training epochs)
  • Use 4 processes to speed up the data generation
• Add 3 more upsampling blocks (a subpixel layer is not enough to upsample a 1200-sample tensor to 4800 samples and has no parameters)
• Reconstruct the low-resolution signal without applying interpolation (e.g a 100-sample chunk downsampled with a factor of 4 becomes a chunk of length 25, which will be fed to the network as-is without interpolation)
• Get evaluation metrics (NRMSE comparisons for the high-res/super-res signals and the high-res/interpolated signals)
• Display some scatterplots
• Compare the 5e-4 learning rate model with the 100-epoch 1e-4 model and the 200-epoch 1e-4 model

3rd stage

• Increase the number of filters in the Conv1D layers from 32 to 64 and train

4th stage

• Set the filter no. configuration to 64-128-256-256-256-128-64, with the last 2 upsampling blocks retaining the 64-64 arrangement

5th stage

• Add BatchNorm to the downsampling blocks

6th stage

• Perform an ablation study to analyze how much each residual block contributes to the noise found in the model output

7th stage

• Replace the last two upsampling blocks with 1D Inception modules as an experiment

The values are the averages of the outputs for each test sample. These were computed with tf.keras.evaluate(...).

Evaluation metrics

3-layer model			4-layer model			5-layer model
MSE	SNR	NRMSE	MSE	SNR	NRMSE	MSE	SNR	NRMSE
67026	15.31	0.1779	68838	15.45	0.1667	64744	15.46	0.1689

Evaluation metrics (with Inception blocks)

3-layer model			4-layer model			5-layer model
MSE	SNR	NRMSE	MSE	SNR	NRMSE	MSE	SNR	NRMSE
170675	12.88	0.4275	81340	14.16	0.2289	75183	14.28	0.2341

8th stage

• remove the dropout layers from the Inception blocks and notice the effect

Evaluation metrics

5-layer model (Inception modules with dropout)			5-layer model (Inception modules without dropout)
MSE	SNR	NRMSE	MSE	SNR	NRMSE
75183	14.28	0.2341	42914	16.62	0.1116

9th stage

• remove the dropout layers from the last two upsampling blocks of the normal 5-layer model and notice the effect

Evaluation metrics

5-layer model (Inception modules with dropout)			5-layer model (Inception modules without dropout)			5-layer model (no Inception modules, no dropout in the last 2 blocks)
MSE	SNR	NRMSE	MSE	SNR	NRMSE	MSE	SNR	NRMSE
75183	14.28	0.2341	42914	16.62	0.1116	45324	16.57	0.1125

10th stage

• remove the dropout layers from the last two upsampling blocks of the normal 3-layer and 4-layer models and notice the effect

	3-blocks model			4-blocks model			5-blocks model
	MSE	SNR	NRMSE	MSE	SNR	NRMSE	MSE	SNR	NRMSE
upsampling blocks with dropout	67026	22.78	0.1779	66944	22.92	0.1737	64744	23.07	0.1689
upsampling blocks without dropout	51023	25.43	0.1162	47582	25.74	0.1125	45324	25.73	0.1125
with Inception modules, with dropout	170675	15.23	0.4275	81340	19.79	0.2289	75183	20.27	0.2341
with Inception modules, without dropout	49434	25.64	0.1143	55401	25.41	0.1194	42914	25.87	0.1116

Baseline comparisons

The linear and cubic spline baselines have been computed as the means of the signal-to-noise ratio for all test samples. To compute the SNR for the model with Inception modules containing no dropout, a batch size of 1 is used, since Keras.evaluate technically computes a mean over the output metrics for each test sample (using a larger batch size would skew the result).

Linear interpolation	Cubic spline interpolation	5-layer model with Inception blocks containing no dropout
19.67	26.80	27.57