Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: improve permissions readability and selection #153

Open
Firgrep opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Feature request: improve permissions readability and selection #153

Firgrep opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Firgrep
Copy link

Firgrep commented Oct 24, 2024

Hi, we have an app with very granular permissions control, so that roles usually end up having a lot of permissions (10-20+) with lengthy names. It's clunky to manage from the current dashboard, especially as permission names get truncated. Here are some desired features.

  1. It would be great if permissions could be defined in one area, and then selected from a menu when assigning permissions to roles. This way, if someone intends to assign the same permission to different roles, it would be ensured that it is the one permission rather than typing it out as a string (which could allow for errors).
  2. Allow expanding permissions names to see the full value. Even when opening the "Role info" dialog, the permissions are truncated, making it hard to read.
  3. An API to get all the permissions defined, so that apps that make use of the permissions defined would get exactly the set that is in use.

Seems some of this is related to #4 .

Otherwise, we're enjoying building things with Supertokens and we hope it continues to improve! Thank you.

@rishabhpoddar
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Firgrep , all excellent suggestions. Though we have other priorities at the moment. We will add this to our backlog, but can't give a timeline as of now. If more people upvote this, we can increase the priority.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants