-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Testing - Authority record samples #1431
Comments
Documenting here differences in ebsco loaded authority records vs. data import Jeremy posted a record using the ebsco tools to both /authority-storage/authorities and SRS
I loaded the same record to data import with the default authorities profile and did a
Linking worked for the data import record and the ebsco loaded record. |
The $t is being ignored in the ebsco handling of 4xx fields. There is an open ticket from 2022 in the folio-migration-tools to support requiredSubfield I haven't figured out exactly what is going on with the ID differences but one is that the migration tools are concatenating the 001 and 003 Something is missing regarding the 008 handling as well. |
Some records have been loaded to stage already
Sample files here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: