support eip-2981 for royalty

[LeoHChen]

Shall we shall support EIP-2981 for Royalty in our NFT or create separate mechanism to handle royalty?

My thinking would be support EIP-2981 for NFT that are 1st party NFT created in our platform. But for some NFT has not EIP-2981 supported, we shall support another way of the royalty in the protocol.

[Ramarti]

EIP-2981 is meant to signal royalties for NFT sales on markets. IMO this was made with art NFT/PFPs in mind, I'm not really sure if it matches IPAsset holder's use case, since I would expect them to want to hold the NFT (IP Rights) and license some rights to it, with earnings coming from other medium than sales. I expect our case to be more complex/dynamic that setting a % royalties fee.

There is also the issue of several NFT markets flat out refusing to to honor royalties.

My thinking here is to prioritize defining the IP framework and what a transfer means for IP Assets, then we could add EIP-2981 "on top" of our royalty price mechanism, to help with compatibility in markets that support it.

[LeoHChen]

It's more about external collaboration and support. I am thinking if creators created pfp/art NFT on our platform using some factory, we can provide this option in our factory contract.

Agree not a high priority. And it's not protocol.