You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I figured I would just make an issue to keep track of these these post-meeting. The "i" icon on dataset on the OARD site is a little hard to see, and the difference in sets could be more clearly printed underneath the section that looks like this and then the results can go under it, just to remind the user of what the dataset number indicates. Alternatively, you could make a shortcut string name for each dataset.
Also, it's not super clear that you have to type one term in the first field or a list of terms to then get pair frequencies. If left blank, "mostFrequency" returns the same result as singleConcept. Some instructional tutorial or something to make this clear to the user may be really helpful.
Lastly, maybe highlight the words underneath like: _O_pen _ _A_nnotation of _R_are _D_iseases to make OARD's meaning clearer.
We can use this to discuss, if you like.
Best,
Jim
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey Cong,
I figured I would just make an issue to keep track of these these post-meeting. The "i" icon on dataset on the OARD site is a little hard to see, and the difference in sets could be more clearly printed underneath the section that looks like this and then the results can go under it, just to remind the user of what the dataset number indicates. Alternatively, you could make a shortcut string name for each dataset.
Also, it's not super clear that you have to type one term in the first field or a list of terms to then get pair frequencies. If left blank, "mostFrequency" returns the same result as singleConcept. Some instructional tutorial or something to make this clear to the user may be really helpful.
Lastly, maybe highlight the words underneath like: _O_pen _ _A_nnotation of _R_are _D_iseases to make OARD's meaning clearer.
We can use this to discuss, if you like.
Best,
Jim
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: