You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Within FPCF, bottom is the "worst" value, or most imprecise value, and top is the best/most precise one.
E.g. for a call graph, bottom is the set of all edges, and top the empty set.
Thus, a lower bound would be the set of edges that can be included at worst, an the upper-bound the set that must be included according to the analysis.
In most related work, in particular in the field of abstract interpretation, this is vise-versa.
We should refactor the whole framework as well as all analyses, such that we use the terms common in literature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Within FPCF, bottom is the "worst" value, or most imprecise value, and top is the best/most precise one.
E.g. for a call graph, bottom is the set of all edges, and top the empty set.
Thus, a lower bound would be the set of edges that can be included at worst, an the upper-bound the set that must be included according to the analysis.
In most related work, in particular in the field of abstract interpretation, this is vise-versa.
We should refactor the whole framework as well as all analyses, such that we use the terms common in literature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: