Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 12, 2019. It is now read-only.

[Bridge] Would be nice if ExtraMemo was not required in order to do compliance #40

Open
Mr0grog opened this issue Sep 29, 2016 · 0 comments
Milestone

Comments

@Mr0grog
Copy link
Contributor

Mr0grog commented Sep 29, 2016

In writing the new anchor guide, I was at first a little confused to find that I had to specify extra_memo in the payment parameters to the bridge server in order to trigger usage of the compliance server (in my first several attempts, I had left it empty and couldn’t figure out why I wasn’t seeing any compliance activity).

After looking through the source, I definitely understand that using extra_memo as a shorthand prevents hitting the receiver’s stellar.toml (especially since the compliance server will do it again), but from a user perspective, this still seems a little awkward. Maybe the compliance server could respond with a special status code to indicate that no compliance was necessary or maybe the bridge server could pass along the foreign stellar.toml data?

@jedmccaleb jedmccaleb added this to the after port milestone Oct 3, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants