Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix previous_bit_reversed_circle_domain_index. #709

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2024

Conversation

alonh5
Copy link
Contributor

@alonh5 alonh5 commented Jul 7, 2024

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Contributor Author

alonh5 commented Jul 7, 2024

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @alonh5 and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.32%. Comparing base (e167c42) to head (f975168).
Report is 4 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #709      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.26%   90.32%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          75       75              
  Lines        9944    10203     +259     
  Branches     9944    10203     +259     
==========================================
+ Hits         8976     9216     +240     
- Misses        889      903      +14     
- Partials       79       84       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@alonh5 alonh5 force-pushed the 07-07-fix_previous_bit_reversed_circle_domain_index branch from 7d432c3 to 2f5987c Compare July 7, 2024 10:54
@alonh5 alonh5 requested a review from spapinistarkware July 7, 2024 10:55
Copy link
Contributor

@spapinistarkware spapinistarkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

:lgtm:

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @alonh5)

@alonh5 alonh5 requested a review from shaharsamocha7 July 7, 2024 10:59
@alonh5 alonh5 force-pushed the 07-07-fix_previous_bit_reversed_circle_domain_index branch from 2f5987c to af41be9 Compare July 8, 2024 07:31
Copy link
Collaborator

@shaharsamocha7 shaharsamocha7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @alonh5)


crates/prover/src/core/utils.rs line 204 at r1 (raw file):

    #[test]
    fn test_previous_bit_reversed_circle_domain_index() {

Fix test to use eval_log_size > domain_log_size - 1
so we can see that this fix worked

Code quote:

    #[test]
    fn test_previous_bit_reversed_circle_domain_index() {

Copy link
Contributor Author

@alonh5 alonh5 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @shaharsamocha7)


crates/prover/src/core/utils.rs line 204 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, shaharsamocha7 wrote…

Fix test to use eval_log_size > domain_log_size - 1
so we can see that this fix worked

I did, that's the addition at the end of the test.

@alonh5 alonh5 force-pushed the 07-07-fix_previous_bit_reversed_circle_domain_index branch from af41be9 to f975168 Compare July 8, 2024 10:19
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alonh5 alonh5 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @shaharsamocha7 and @spapinistarkware)


crates/prover/src/core/utils.rs line 204 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, alonh5 (Alon Haramati) wrote…

I did, that's the addition at the end of the test.

Done.

Copy link
Collaborator

@shaharsamocha7 shaharsamocha7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @alonh5)

@alonh5 alonh5 merged commit 91a2833 into dev Jul 8, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants