-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix previous_bit_reversed_circle_domain_index. #709
Fix previous_bit_reversed_circle_domain_index. #709
Conversation
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #709 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.26% 90.32% +0.06%
==========================================
Files 75 75
Lines 9944 10203 +259
Branches 9944 10203 +259
==========================================
+ Hits 8976 9216 +240
- Misses 889 903 +14
- Partials 79 84 +5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
7d432c3
to
2f5987c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @alonh5)
2f5987c
to
af41be9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @alonh5)
crates/prover/src/core/utils.rs
line 204 at r1 (raw file):
#[test] fn test_previous_bit_reversed_circle_domain_index() {
Fix test to use eval_log_size > domain_log_size - 1
so we can see that this fix worked
Code quote:
#[test]
fn test_previous_bit_reversed_circle_domain_index() {
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @shaharsamocha7)
crates/prover/src/core/utils.rs
line 204 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, shaharsamocha7 wrote…
Fix test to use eval_log_size > domain_log_size - 1
so we can see that this fix worked
I did, that's the addition at the end of the test.
af41be9
to
f975168
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @shaharsamocha7 and @spapinistarkware)
crates/prover/src/core/utils.rs
line 204 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, alonh5 (Alon Haramati) wrote…
I did, that's the addition at the end of the test.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @alonh5)
This change is