New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use Forecast Extension instead of package-specific fields #8

Open

m-mohr opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 1 comment

Labels

m-mohr commented May 14, 2024

The fields

"ecmwf:reference_datetime": "2022-02-01T00:00:00Z",
"ecmwf:forecast_datetime": "2022-02-01T00:00:00Z",
"ecmwf:step": "0h",

are also defined in the forecast extension. The fields should be preferred over the fields used here.

m-mohr added the enhancement label

Member

TomAugspurger commented Jun 1, 2024

Agreed. We'll probably want the forecast: fields in addition to these, to avoid breaking users relying on the current names.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment