Testing Before First Release #10
Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
@xydesa and I have used the NTRTSim repository to test in the past as it has a variety of file types and a fairly large number of files. I have a fork running the Statick action. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@xydesa, @tdenewiler - I've dropped the ball on this, but am testing a new release to 0.8.2 to make a full release. But on the statick-action self test, I'm running into an issue on the discovery plugin for the documentation profile. https://github.com/gregtkogut/statick-action/runs/6951548512?check_suite_focus=true Does this repo need the same update to the discovery plugins as the main repo? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I tested on four forked repos today: https://github.com/gregtkogut/rclpy/actions It appears to work...in addition to continuing to work for statick proper. I didn't test a bunch of the myriad configuration options. Are there any that should be tested, or are you guys OK with making the first proper full release of the action? @tdenewiler , @xydesa |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is working for me on one of my favored test repositories. I tested with and without the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This acts as an informal peer review before putting the action into official release status.
I wanted to stress test both the action and indirectly statick itself.
Here are a lists to the action results in my personal repo area. I will update this list as I add more repos. Please suggest more repos. In addition, suggest different ways to exercise the action and statick, e.g. different profiles or settings.,
@denewiler, @xydesa
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions