You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Probably multiple Mann-Whitney U tests, or a Kruskal-Wallis H test
Granularity
Paired (Triplets) categorical -> quantitative
Probably multiple Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, or a Friedman test.
Notes from Zhen on the Friedman test and why I think it works:
Classic analogies for when to use the Friedman test are:
n wine judges each rate k different wines. Are any of the k wines ranked consistently higher or lower than the others?
The 3 granularity levels are the k wines. The 1884+596 partial repairs are the n judges. Pos/Neu/Neg change in tests are the rankings.
n welders each use k welding torches, and the ensuing welds were rated on quality. Do any of the k torches produce consistently better or worse welds?
The 3 granularity levels are the k welding torches. The 1884+596 partial repairs are the n welders. Pos/Neu/Neg change in tests are the better/worse welds.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Partial repair identification:
Granularity
Notes from Zhen on the Friedman test and why I think it works:
Classic analogies for when to use the Friedman test are:
The 3 granularity levels are the k wines. The 1884+596 partial repairs are the n judges. Pos/Neu/Neg change in tests are the rankings.
The 3 granularity levels are the k welding torches. The 1884+596 partial repairs are the n welders. Pos/Neu/Neg change in tests are the better/worse welds.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: