Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run stat tests on the partial repairs statistics #47

Open
zhenyudg opened this issue Aug 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Run stat tests on the partial repairs statistics #47

zhenyudg opened this issue Aug 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@zhenyudg
Copy link
Member

Partial repair identification:

  • N-sample categorical -> quantitative
  • Probably multiple Mann-Whitney U tests, or a Kruskal-Wallis H test

Granularity

  • Paired (Triplets) categorical -> quantitative
  • Probably multiple Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, or a Friedman test.

Notes from Zhen on the Friedman test and why I think it works:

Classic analogies for when to use the Friedman test are:

n wine judges each rate k different wines. Are any of the k wines ranked consistently higher or lower than the others?

The 3 granularity levels are the k wines. The 1884+596 partial repairs are the n judges. Pos/Neu/Neg change in tests are the rankings.

n welders each use k welding torches, and the ensuing welds were rated on quality. Do any of the k torches produce consistently better or worse welds?

The 3 granularity levels are the k welding torches. The 1884+596 partial repairs are the n welders. Pos/Neu/Neg change in tests are the better/worse welds.

@zhenyudg zhenyudg added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 30, 2020
@zhenyudg
Copy link
Member Author

Alternatively, if we don't use weighting of partial repairs, we could work with Categorical->Categorical data. In that case, we can use a chi^2 test.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant