Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incomplete sentence in documentation of data-jdbc Back references #1949

Closed
dschulten opened this issue Nov 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Incomplete sentence in documentation of data-jdbc Back references #1949

dschulten opened this issue Nov 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
type: documentation A documentation update

Comments

@dschulten
Copy link

The last sentence of https://docs.spring.io/spring-data/relational/reference/jdbc/mapping.html#jdbc.entity-persistence.types.backrefs is a single bullet item and says: "* Types for which you registered suitable ."

Either something important is missing here, or maybe the text can be removed.

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Nov 24, 2024
@schauder schauder self-assigned this Nov 25, 2024
@schauder schauder added type: documentation A documentation update and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Nov 25, 2024
schauder added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2024
The reference was both broken and somehow got moved to the wrong place.

Closes #1949
schauder added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2024
The reference was both broken and somehow got moved to the wrong place.

Closes #1949
@schauder schauder added this to the 3.3.7 (2024.0.7) milestone Nov 25, 2024
@schauder
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for reporting this. That bullet point somehow got badly mangled and also got lost in the wrong section.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: documentation A documentation update
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants