Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for Queries and Dashboards #7

Open
CMorton737 opened this issue Oct 16, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

Support for Queries and Dashboards #7

CMorton737 opened this issue Oct 16, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@CMorton737
Copy link

Hi,

Im curious if your long-term vision for this repository includes support for Query and Dashboard resources?

@jbeemster
Copy link
Member

Hey @CMorton737 - we would certainly like to add them for sure - our initial use case however is really around datasources and ACL management so not sure when we will get to that. We are always open to PRs however!

@avnerenv0
Copy link

Is anyone working on this?
I can try to help and if not I can give it a try

@jbeemster
Copy link
Member

Hey @avnerenv0 - for our internal use case (and why we built this provider) we do not need it so its not something we are actively working on. We would however be happy to review and merge PR's that added new functionality happily!

@digitalpoetry
Copy link

Hi. I've created forked this repo (along with the redash-client-go) to build out basic support for Queries, Dashboards, Visualizations, and Widgets in Redash.

https://github.com/digitalpoetry/terraform-provider-redash

I'd love to these changes back to this repo if we're open to improvements here. I had submitted snowplow-devops/redash-client-go#10 to the redash-client-go repo to support the new features back in November 2021, but I didn't get much response from anyone. Just reaching out again to see if there's interest in accepting other contributions for this project.

@jbeemster
Copy link
Member

Hi @digitalpoetry this has not been high on the list for a while but I am getting around to cleaning it up now. If you are still open to re-opening PR's on top of the latest master (there should not be much drift really) I am happy to review and get it merged in!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants