From 099badc54d5dcdaef296d52f80258bed566b1404 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zoey <zoeykaiser8@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 20:34:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Create feature-requests.yml

---
 .../DISCUSSION_TEMPLATE/feature-requests.yml  | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 .github/DISCUSSION_TEMPLATE/feature-requests.yml

diff --git a/.github/DISCUSSION_TEMPLATE/feature-requests.yml b/.github/DISCUSSION_TEMPLATE/feature-requests.yml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9d31ded7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/DISCUSSION_TEMPLATE/feature-requests.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+name: "🚀 Feature request"
+description: Suggest a feature that will improve NuxtAuth
+labels: ["pending", "enchantment"]
+body:
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        Thank you for taking the time to fill out this feature request!
+  - type: textarea
+    id: feature-description
+    attributes:
+      label: Describe the feature
+      description: A clear and concise description of what you think would be a helpful addition to NuxtAuth, including the possible use cases and alternatives you have considered. If you have a working prototype or module that implements it, please include a link.
+      placeholder: Feature description
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: provider
+    attributes:
+      label: Which provider would this enchantment improve?
+      description: We currently offer three providers: authjs, local and refresh. If the enchanment is a general one, please select all three.
+      options:
+        - label: AuthJS
+        - label: Local
+        - label: Refresh
+        - label: New Provider
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: additional-info
+    attributes:
+      label: Additional information
+      description: Additional information that helps us decide how to proceed.
+      options:
+        - label: Would you be willing to help implement this feature?