We'd love to get patches from you!
We are not currently publishing snapshots for Finagle's dependencies, which
means that it may be necessary to publish the develop
branches of these
libraries locally in order to work on Finagle's develop
branch. To do so
you can run ./bin/travisci
script and pass it an optional
TRAVIS_SCALA_VERSION
environment variable. For example, the following command
locally publishes all the Finagle dependencies built for Scala 2.11.7.
TRAVIS_SCALA_VERSION=2.11.7 ./bin/travisci
We are planning to begin publishing snapshots soon, which will make these steps unnecessary. If you have any questions or run into any problems, please create an issue here, tweet at us at @finagle, or email the Finaglers mailing list.
The workflow that we support:
- Fork finagle
- Check out the
develop
branch - Make a feature branch (use
git checkout -b "cool-new-feature"
) - Make your cool new feature or bugfix on your branch
- Write a test for your change
- From your branch, make a pull request against
twitter/finagle/develop
- Work with repo maintainers to get your change reviewed
- Wait for your change to be pulled into
twitter/finagle/develop
- Merge
twitter/finagle/develop
into your origindevelop
- Delete your feature branch
We've standardized on using the ScalaTest testing framework.
Because ScalaTest has such a big surface area, we use a restricted subset of it
in our tests to keep them easy to read. We've chosen the assert
API, not the
Matchers
one, and we use the FunSuite
mixin, which supports
xUnit-like semantics.
We encourage our contributors to ensure Java compatibility for any new public APIs
they introduce. The easiest way to do so is to provide Java compilation tests
and make sure the new API is easily accessible (typing X$.MODULE$
is not easy)
from Java. These compilation tests also provide Java users with testable examples
of the API usage. For an example of a Java compilation test see
AddrCompilationTest.java.
Note that while you will see a Travis CI status message in your pull request, this may not always be accurate, and in any case all changes will be tested internally at Twitter before being merged. We're working to make Travis CI more useful for development, but for now you don't need to worry if it's failing (assuming that you are able to build and test your changes locally).
We generally follow Effective Scala and the Scala Style Guide. When in doubt, look around the codebase and see how it's done elsewhere.
When creating an issue please try to ahere to the following format:
One line summary of the issue (less than 72 characters)
### Expected behavior
As concisely as possible, describe the expected behavior.
### Actual behavior
As concisely as possible, describe the observed behavior.
### Steps to reproduce the behavior
List all relevant steps to reproduce the observed behavior.
Comments should be formatted to a width no greater than 80 columns.
Files should be exempt of trailing spaces.
We adhere to a specific format for commit messages. Please write your commit
messages along these guidelines. Please keep the line width no greater than
80 columns (You can use fmt -n -p -w 80
to accomplish this).
One line description of your change (less than 72 characters)
Problem
Explain the context and why you're making that change. What is the
problem you're trying to solve? In some cases there is not a problem
and this can be thought of being the motivation for your change.
Solution
Describe the modifications you've done.
Result
What will change as a result of your pull request? Note that sometimes
this section is unnecessary because it is self-explanatory based on
the solution.
The Finagle repository on GitHub is kept in sync with an internal repository at Twitter. For the most part this process should be transparent to Finagle users, but it does have some implications for how pull requests are merged into the codebase.
When you submit a pull request on GitHub, it will be reviewed by the Finagle community (both inside and outside of Twitter), and once the changes are approved, your commits will be brought into the internal system for additional testing. Once the changes are merged internally, they will be pushed back to GitHub with the next release.
This process means that the pull request will not be merged in the usual way. Instead a member of the Finagle team will post a message in the pull request thread when your changes have made their way back to GitHub, and the pull request will be closed (see this pull request for an example). The changes in the pull request will be collapsed into a single commit, but the authorship metadata will be preserved.
Please let us know if you have any questions about this process!
We've created a Starter
label for issues that we think are likely to be
reasonably limited in scope and ready to be tackled by new contributors. Please
feel free to ask questions in the issue thread or on the mailing list if
you run into problems trying to implement a new feature or fix a bug described
in one of the starter issues.
We also welcome improvements to the Finagle documentation, which is maintained in this repository and hosted on the corresponding GitHub Pages site.
Finagle uses Sphinx to generate its user guide via the built-in Sphinx support in the sbt-site plugin. You'll need to install Sphinx on your system before you can build the site locally.
Once you've got Sphinx installed, you can make changes to the RST files in
the doc/src/sphinx
directory and then build the site with the following
command:
./sbt 'project finagle-doc' make-site
You can then view the site locally at doc/target/site/index.html
.
Please note that sbt-site currently will not work with the Python 3 version of
Sphinx. It's also hard-coded to call an executable named sphinx-build
, which
on some systems may be the name of the Python 3 version, with the Python 2
version named sphinx-build2
. If the site build process crashes with a "Failed
to build Sphinx html documentation", this is likely to be the problem. The
simplest solution is to create a symbolic link to sphinx-build2
named
sphinx-build
somewhere on your path.
Please note that any additions or changes to the API must be thoroughly described in ScalaDoc comments. We will also happily consider pull requests that improve the existing ScalaDocs!