You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have some suggestions regarding CC knobs that are shown in the "Controls" tab if anyone is interested.
The first one is pretty simple, maybe can add an option to show/hide the Volume & Pan CC parameter knobs from showing up in the "Controls" tab. Reason I say this is because they are already present in the GUI in the upper right corner. This could also give some more room in the "Controls" tab section if needed which could help the next suggestion as well.
Not sure what the best solution for this would be but, the "Controls" tab shows CC knobs in sequential order which I think overall makes sense. However at times if instruments contain many CC parameter knobs, especially knobs that share a specific group/function, it would be nice to be able to organize them so that they end up together, so they can be easily seen/accessed in the order they belong in.
A perfect example would be ADSR envelopes. These four parameters would be nice to be able to be seen together but currently could end up showing up in two different rows depending on the amount/numbering of other parameters. If possible offer some way of letting user be able to choose this. Probably not going to be added like this, but ideally it would be in some way that would allow for a kind of "rule" that would happen automatically if certain knobs are present rather than user having to change the order for every single instrument, if this makes sense.
So based on same example, if the ADSR parameters were detected they would show up in their own row automatically. Again I do not see this being added but if anyone has any ideas.
Only thing I can think of to maybe be able to correct this right now is user would have to add other CC parameter knob based on their CC numbers in order to move the other ADSR parameters around, but then you could end up with more confusing knobs that do not have a purpose in the GUI.
Anyways if anyone agrees or has any ideas, please mention them.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I have some suggestions regarding CC knobs that are shown in the "Controls" tab if anyone is interested.
The first one is pretty simple, maybe can add an option to show/hide the Volume & Pan CC parameter knobs from showing up in the "Controls" tab. Reason I say this is because they are already present in the GUI in the upper right corner. This could also give some more room in the "Controls" tab section if needed which could help the next suggestion as well.
Not sure what the best solution for this would be but, the "Controls" tab shows CC knobs in sequential order which I think overall makes sense. However at times if instruments contain many CC parameter knobs, especially knobs that share a specific group/function, it would be nice to be able to organize them so that they end up together, so they can be easily seen/accessed in the order they belong in.
A perfect example would be ADSR envelopes. These four parameters would be nice to be able to be seen together but currently could end up showing up in two different rows depending on the amount/numbering of other parameters. If possible offer some way of letting user be able to choose this. Probably not going to be added like this, but ideally it would be in some way that would allow for a kind of "rule" that would happen automatically if certain knobs are present rather than user having to change the order for every single instrument, if this makes sense.
So based on same example, if the ADSR parameters were detected they would show up in their own row automatically. Again I do not see this being added but if anyone has any ideas.
Only thing I can think of to maybe be able to correct this right now is user would have to add other CC parameter knob based on their CC numbers in order to move the other ADSR parameters around, but then you could end up with more confusing knobs that do not have a purpose in the GUI.
Anyways if anyone agrees or has any ideas, please mention them.
Thank You
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions