You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This wouldn't work well with exclusive/disjoint constraints over different view atoms, though, unless it was a shorthand (and I'm torn as to whether Starling should have lots of syntactic sugar, or little syntactic sugar).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I wonder if
exclusive
anddisjoint
would be more ergonomic if expressible on view atoms instead of views, e.g.This wouldn't work well with exclusive/disjoint constraints over different view atoms, though, unless it was a shorthand (and I'm torn as to whether Starling should have lots of syntactic sugar, or little syntactic sugar).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: