Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[grasshopper] Let procedures / post-condition refer to pre-condition footprint #124

Open
septract opened this issue Dec 19, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@septract
Copy link
Owner

Right now we existentially quantify the footprint separately for the pre/post. We might want to rearrange this so we quantify the pre-footprint in the procedure argument, because this would mean we could compare the pre/post footprint, and refer to it explicitly in procedure calls.

@MattWindsor91
Copy link
Collaborator

Would this at all help with problems relating to assignment? Eg. being able to pure-assume that e is not in the pre-condition footprint. Or is the problem here entirely due to the postcondition?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants