You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems all ? does is allow hsf/muz3 to generate funcs, it'd be useful (say for dekkers) to allow us to write something like
{| ? |} <a_want = (1)>; {| AWant() * ? |}
Where we know some partial information about one thread and not about the other, for instance. I'm not sure if this would help performance of hsf as well, giving more information.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently we allow
{| ? |} C; {| ? |}
It seems all
?
does is allow hsf/muz3 to generate funcs, it'd be useful (say for dekkers) to allow us to write something like{| ? |} <a_want = (1)>; {| AWant() * ? |}
Where we know some partial information about one thread and not about the other, for instance. I'm not sure if this would help performance of hsf as well, giving more information.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: