Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define SFS year 2 spatial domain from swab-and-send zips #7

Closed
famulare opened this issue Nov 19, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Define SFS year 2 spatial domain from swab-and-send zips #7

famulare opened this issue Nov 19, 2019 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@famulare
Copy link
Member

SFS Year 2 has a hybrid spatial domain--recruitment and messaging focused in Seattle but accepting enrollees through retrospectives and swab-and-send from outside city limits. For downstream analysis, we wanted to define a "canonical" spatial domain as neighborhood_district_name within seattle and puma outside seattle. This requires building a shape set with the right names, some choices about mapping zipcode onto neighborhood/puma, and defining a master lookup list for all data.

@famulare famulare self-assigned this Nov 19, 2019
@famulare
Copy link
Member Author

@trvrb @tsibley I added a set of geojsons that form the "canonical" shape set for the SFS Year 2. https://github.com/seattleflu/seattle-geojson/tree/master/sfs_domain_geojsons Lat-long points are included, and I wiggled a few to be more population-weighted for pumas at the edge of the domain to make more reasonable auspice centroids. Take a look and let me know if you have any comments.

@tsibley
Copy link
Member

tsibley commented Nov 27, 2019

@famulare Thanks. Are you using the regional_name of each geometry as the primary key in your models?

@famulare
Copy link
Member Author

famulare commented Dec 4, 2019

Yes! Probably should’ve said that explicitly somewhere.

@trvrb
Copy link
Member

trvrb commented Dec 31, 2019

@famulare @tsibley --- Thanks for this. https://github.com/seattleflu/seattle-geojson/blob/master/sfs_domain_geojsons/sfs_domain_neighborhood%2Bpuma.geojson looks great. I do have one question: what's the best way to lookup the "SFS domain" (neighborhood or puma) associated with a particular census tract?

It looks like it will take a while to get this natively exported as shipping view from ID3C and so I would plan to just make a mapping table as part of https://github.com/seattleflu/augur-build. @famulare, I would assume you're already doing this as part of incidence-mapper?

@famulare
Copy link
Member Author

famulare commented Jan 8, 2020

The lookup table is embedded in this tract level geojson: https://github.com/seattleflu/seattle-geojson/blob/master/sfs_domain_geojsons/2016_wa_censusTracts%2Bsfs_domain.geojson.

The intended reference columns are GEOID (tract) and PUMA (which should be the 7 digit version per earlier discussions but is currently 5 #11), and regional_name. regional_name is inherited from the Seattle Neighborhood District names or the PUMA name, but a few of the boundary regions are smaller than the PUMA and so the names could arguably be edited.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants