-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature Request] Highlight intensity #65
Comments
Thank you for the continued interest and suggestions, it's great to know the work is appreciated! I will say that I have been concerned about bloat recently, mainly since I have been a bit enthusiastic about adding new features. I think it's OK at the moment, but I'm being more cautious now and too much power can be a bad thing of course. That said, I like this idea - I'm always for more personalisation, and this would definitely be useful. Here are some of my thoughts:
Possible solutions:
|
By the way, I'm not sure if you know this, but there are other possible workflows in Mark My Search. You can hide/show highlights without removing them using Alt+Shift+D, and you can set hidden to be the default: With highlights hidden, there are still two built-in tools to let you find matches:
You can use these instead of looking for highlights manually. When 'jumping' using the buttons, highlights are temporarily shown for the group which was focused. |
Oof, yeah your possible solutions are a spot-on analysis of possible paths and problems around each choice. Very impressive. I personally want to have have something in the interface that would let me modify things on the fly. Something like this: But I can see why that wouldn't be ideal for the average user and might clog the interface. We've already got a lot of buttons and browser add-ons with tons of buttons generally get a cold response. I guess the best course of action is therefore the second option of a Global Setting, but you're right that few will ever see it. That likely makes this a low priority enhancement. |
No I had no idea. Again, very impressive. Thank you. |
Makes sense, it would definitely fit in - I would probably put it on the left next to highlight visibility (maybe it could be one button which hides highlights when you dim them twice..?). All buttons can be toggled in the settings, and this would be a default-off (like the globe [search] now is) - I think you're right it might clog the interface, and I'll experiment of course when I get round to it. |
Current plan as partially outlined in this issue: Toolbar
Options
Note that while this is going to be a lot of additional complexity, I'll try to keep it as isolated as possible. I would consign this to an 'plug-in' add-on for MMS, but seeing as it's an accessibility issue I'm bumping it temporarily to mainline extension work. In the future there will probably be a 'toolbar options for MMS' plug-in; when this is achieved, one of the first control/options combos to be transferred in will be this contrast button. There will be a significant migration period wherein users are given plenty of time to install this plug-in and set it up to their needs, which will be halted if user feedback is negative. |
The program is coming along really well and is way above what I expected. You've already included Regex and Whole Words checks. Just amazing ...
I say that both as a compliment and as a setup for the next issue because something that I'm running into is how the add-on is oddly a victim of it's own success.
CURRENT BEHAVIOR
When I do a search with 6+ keywords that are more basic words, it'll essentially flag the whole page. And now that I'm using the program almost all the time, highlighting the entire page has sort of the of just making it a pastel monster. It makes it hard to read and the best option is to manually zap keyword highlights until I get down to the main bits.
I can add some screenshots of recent searches that I'm doing if needed.
REQUESTED BEHAVIOR
If there's a way to make the results either A) less intense or B) turn up the transparency, that would be ideal. I wouldn't want to make the term listing up at the top any more transparent, just the words it's highlighting in page. So there's just a soft highlight for the key terms.
Hope that's an interesting suggestion, thanks for your work on this. More to come
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: