You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to use rdfpipe as a tool to quickly check whether a graph does not contain any syntax errors, and format it. If it does contain syntax errors however, currently the tool just outputs "Could not parse graph". It would be extremely useful to get a pointer to which line in the input contains the mistake. Is that possible to print in addition to the generic error message?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't think we can do it with the current approach; we just do source.add_to_graph(graph), which calls insert_all().
We should change the approach as suggested in #14 to stream triples (instead of loading the whole graph in RAM as is done now).
Once triples are parsed iteratively, it should be possible to return the exact line raising the error.
That makes sense. Great issue for our brand new rustaceans! For now I will use the elsecvier vscode extnesion to do it, if I cannot parse with rdfpipe,
I would like to use rdfpipe as a tool to quickly check whether a graph does not contain any syntax errors, and format it. If it does contain syntax errors however, currently the tool just outputs "Could not parse graph". It would be extremely useful to get a pointer to which line in the input contains the mistake. Is that possible to print in addition to the generic error message?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: