Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
selftests/bpf: Fix flaky test btf_map_in_map/lookup_update
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
[ Upstream commit 14bb1e8 ]

Recently, I frequently hit the following test failure:

  [root@arch-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_progs -n 33/1
  test_lookup_update:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
  [...]
  test_lookup_update:PASS:sync_rcu 0 nsec
  test_lookup_update:FAIL:map1_leak inner_map1 leaked!
  #33/1    btf_map_in_map/lookup_update:FAIL
  #33      btf_map_in_map:FAIL

In the test, after map is closed and then after two rcu grace periods,
it is assumed that map_id is not available to user space.

But the above assumption cannot be guaranteed. After zero or one
or two rcu grace periods in different siturations, the actual
freeing-map-work is put into a workqueue. Later on, when the work
is dequeued, the map will be actually freed.
See bpf_map_put() in kernel/bpf/syscall.c.

By using workqueue, there is no ganrantee that map will be actually
freed after a couple of rcu grace periods. This patch removed
such map leak detection and then the test can pass consistently.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
Yonghong Song authored and gregkh committed Jun 27, 2024
1 parent 9233170 commit 4a6adfe
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 25 deletions.
26 changes: 1 addition & 25 deletions tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static void test_lookup_update(void)
int map1_fd, map2_fd, map3_fd, map4_fd, map5_fd, map1_id, map2_id;
int outer_arr_fd, outer_hash_fd, outer_arr_dyn_fd;
struct test_btf_map_in_map *skel;
int err, key = 0, val, i, fd;
int err, key = 0, val, i;

skel = test_btf_map_in_map__open_and_load();
if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed to open&load skeleton\n"))
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -102,30 +102,6 @@ static void test_lookup_update(void)
CHECK(map1_id == 0, "map1_id", "failed to get ID 1\n");
CHECK(map2_id == 0, "map2_id", "failed to get ID 2\n");

test_btf_map_in_map__destroy(skel);
skel = NULL;

/* we need to either wait for or force synchronize_rcu(), before
* checking for "still exists" condition, otherwise map could still be
* resolvable by ID, causing false positives.
*
* Older kernels (5.8 and earlier) freed map only after two
* synchronize_rcu()s, so trigger two, to be entirely sure.
*/
CHECK(kern_sync_rcu(), "sync_rcu", "failed\n");
CHECK(kern_sync_rcu(), "sync_rcu", "failed\n");

fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map1_id);
if (CHECK(fd >= 0, "map1_leak", "inner_map1 leaked!\n")) {
close(fd);
goto cleanup;
}
fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map2_id);
if (CHECK(fd >= 0, "map2_leak", "inner_map2 leaked!\n")) {
close(fd);
goto cleanup;
}

cleanup:
test_btf_map_in_map__destroy(skel);
}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 4a6adfe

Please sign in to comment.