Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Multi-DC] Clients can't connect to multi datacenter cluster using TLS #2263

Open
Tracked by #2230
ylebi opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
Tracked by #2230

[Multi-DC] Clients can't connect to multi datacenter cluster using TLS #2263

ylebi opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@zimnx
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Milestone
v1.17.0

Comments

@ylebi
Copy link
Collaborator

ylebi commented Dec 12, 2024

No description provided.

@ylebi ylebi mentioned this issue Dec 12, 2024
Open
@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot added the needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. label Dec 12, 2024
@ylebi ylebi added priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. and removed needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 12, 2024
@zimnx zimnx self-assigned this Dec 12, 2024
@ylebi ylebi changed the title Clients can't connect to multi datacenter cluster using TLS [Multi-DC] Clients can't connect to multi datacenter cluster using TLS Dec 15, 2024
@zimnx zimnx added this to the v1.17.0 milestone Dec 18, 2024
@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The Scylla Operator project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 30d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out

/lifecycle stale

@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 17, 2025
@zimnx zimnx added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@zimnx zimnx

Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.17.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@zimnx @ylebi