Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Undefined variable watcher #1

Closed
tjvr opened this issue Dec 12, 2016 · 9 comments
Closed

Undefined variable watcher #1

tjvr opened this issue Dec 12, 2016 · 9 comments
Labels

Comments

@tjvr
Copy link
Member

tjvr commented Dec 12, 2016

@PullJosh I think this project contains a variable watcher for a variable that isn't actually defined?

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/97891022/

Pretty sure that's not allowed. Although @nathan's sb2 validator allows it...

@tjvr tjvr added the bug label Dec 12, 2016
@PullJosh
Copy link
Member

PullJosh commented Dec 12, 2016

I can't seem to find it. :/

However, a separate project which includes watchers for non-existent variables/lists would be a good one. I'll throw that together...
Update: Here it is: https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/135980420/

@tjvr
Copy link
Member Author

tjvr commented Dec 12, 2016

Sorry, I meant to paste the offending variable name!

ثم نفس سقطت وبالتحديد،, apparently

@tjvr
Copy link
Member Author

tjvr commented Dec 12, 2016

However, a separate project which includes watchers for non-existent variables/lists would be a good one.

Is it possible to create that using the Scratch 2 editor?

@PullJosh
Copy link
Member

Almost certainly not. :P

@tjvr
Copy link
Member Author

tjvr commented Dec 12, 2016

Almost certainly not. :P

Probably better not include that project then! :P

Please could you fix the existing one? :)

@PullJosh
Copy link
Member

Please could you fix the existing one? :)

I can't seem to find the issue. ثم نفس سقطت وبالتحديد، doesn't appear anywhere in the project for me:
image

@tjvr
Copy link
Member Author

tjvr commented Dec 20, 2016

Oh interesting...

Upon further investigation, I think you're right! It looks like it's actually a kurt bug :-) tjvr/kurt#36

@tjvr tjvr closed this as completed Dec 20, 2016
@PullJosh
Copy link
Member

I suppose that means the corpus is working as intended. ;)

@tjvr
Copy link
Member Author

tjvr commented Dec 20, 2016

Precisely! :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants