You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Developers should be able to express rules that can be used to require some containers to be started and run before others within a single workload.
Context
Many workloads require some form of setup before the main container can run. For example, schema migration needs to be completed, static site data needs to be generated or shared state should be initiated. This set up can involve containers running to completion before another container starts, being ready/healthy before another container starts, or just have started before another container starts. This allows for patterns such as “Sidecars” or “Init Containers” to be implemented.
Many container orchestration platforms provide for ordered container start (Init Containers in Kubernetes, depends_on with service_started, service_healthy, or service_completed_successfully in Docker Compose, run.googleapis.com/container-dependencies in Google Cloud Run.) All of them allow for specifying the start order with various levels of support for conditions on when the next container should start.
Possible implementation
Proposal
Add a new before property to the container object. It would have the following schema:
description: Defines before which other containers this container should be startedtitle: Beforetype: objectproperties:
containers:
description: List of containers that should start after this container.type: arrayitems:
description: A container ID in this workloadtype: stringminLength: 2maxLength: 63pattern: "^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]{0,61}[a-z0-9]$"ready:
description: The status of the container before the next container are started.title: Readytype: stringenum:
- started
- healthy
- complete
Why not use after like compose depends_on ?
This is not a dependency relationship - more a preparatory relationship
Startup order of containers is not strictly speaking a dependency graph like in compose. In the usecase of init containers, the main container is not even run at the same time as the init container. Instead, some kind of state is managed before the main container runs.
In a well factored system, the main container should not have to worry about what init containers were run - rather just that the state is correct. Only the init containers themselves “know” that they need to leave the system is a certain state.
Default state is unaffected
By specifying using before rather than after, the default behavior in score is unaffected. Adding an init container only affects the init container and not the main container.
Detailed description
Developers should be able to express rules that can be used to require some containers to be started and run before others within a single workload.
Context
Many workloads require some form of setup before the main container can run. For example, schema migration needs to be completed, static site data needs to be generated or shared state should be initiated. This set up can involve containers running to completion before another container starts, being ready/healthy before another container starts, or just have started before another container starts. This allows for patterns such as “Sidecars” or “Init Containers” to be implemented.
Many container orchestration platforms provide for ordered container start (Init Containers in Kubernetes,
depends_on
withservice_started
,service_healthy
, orservice_completed_successfully
in Docker Compose,run.googleapis.com/container-dependencies
in Google Cloud Run.) All of them allow for specifying the start order with various levels of support for conditions on when the next container should start.Possible implementation
Proposal
Add a new
before
property to the container object. It would have the following schema:Why not use
after
like composedepends_on
?This is not a dependency relationship - more a preparatory relationship
Startup order of containers is not strictly speaking a dependency graph like in compose. In the usecase of init containers, the main container is not even run at the same time as the init container. Instead, some kind of state is managed before the main container runs.
In a well factored system, the main container should not have to worry about what init containers were run - rather just that the state is correct. Only the init containers themselves “know” that they need to leave the system is a certain state.
Default state is unaffected
By specifying using
before
rather than after, the default behavior in score is unaffected. Adding an init container only affects the init container and not the main container.Example Score Files
Init containers
Score
Kubernetes Pod
Sidecars
Score
Kubernetes Pod (prior to 1.29)
Kubernetes Pod (after 1.29)
Additional information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: