You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I recently received feedback that my integrated dimension reduction plot clustering looked problematic. Specifically, the small clusters peripheral (splash/star?<-- see cluster 7) and the number of distinct clusters.
My clusters were called at 40 PC's w/ 0.6 resolution.
As for the number of clusters, TCR B VDJ subgenes were identified as strong conserved markers in several clusters. I wonder if it is worth excluding VDJ markers from analysis?
Any comment on the appearance of the dim plot and implications would be appreciated. Thank you!
split_seurat <- SplitObject(seurat_phase, split.by = "sample")
split_seurat <- split_seurat[c("samp1_rep1","samp2_rep2","samp3")]
for (i in 1:length(split_seurat)) {
split_seurat[[i]] <- SCTransform(split_seurat[[i]], vars.to.regress = c("celldif","mitoRatio"))
}
saveRDS(split_seurat,file= "split_seurat.rds")
##Second script###
split_seurat <- readRDS("split_seurat.rds")
integ_features <- SelectIntegrationFeatures(object.list = split_seurat,
nfeatures = 3000)
# Prepare the SCT list object for integration
split_seurat <- PrepSCTIntegration(object.list = split_seurat,
anchor.features = integ_features)
# Find best buddies - can take a while to run
integ_anchors <- FindIntegrationAnchors(object.list = split_seurat,
normalization.method = "SCT",
anchor.features = integ_features)
# Integrate across conditions
seurat_integrated <- IntegrateData(anchorset = integ_anchors,
normalization.method = "SCT")
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello,
I have recently followed adopted the Harvard Chan Bioinformatics Core guidelines for SC QC/Normalization/Clustering (https://hbctraining.github.io/scRNA-seq_online/schedule/links-to-lessons.html). I have integrated CD4+/CD8+ T cells from two time points.
I recently received feedback that my integrated dimension reduction plot clustering looked problematic. Specifically, the small clusters peripheral (splash/star?<-- see cluster 7) and the number of distinct clusters.
Data was normalized using SCTransform, variables regressed were mitochondrial ratio and G2M-S phase score difference, as suggested for differentiating cell types. Alternative Workflow: https://satijalab.org/seurat/articles/cell_cycle_vignette.html
My clusters were called at 40 PC's w/ 0.6 resolution.
As for the number of clusters, TCR B VDJ subgenes were identified as strong conserved markers in several clusters. I wonder if it is worth excluding VDJ markers from analysis?
Any comment on the appearance of the dim plot and implications would be appreciated. Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions