Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add APRS group messaging to the GhostNet protocol #19

Open
mechanik556 opened this issue May 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Add APRS group messaging to the GhostNet protocol #19

mechanik556 opened this issue May 11, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@mechanik556
Copy link

Although adding VHF/UHF to the GhostNet plan has been mentioned before for the obvious reasons of reaching more ham operators and providing easier mobile use, given the current (5/11/2024) geomagnetic storm that has completely wiped out HF propagation, I'm sure it's obvious at this point that relying on HF entirely for the comm plan will not always work.

I have a suggestion, which is to add APRS text messaging to the comm plan, particularly group messaging with a set of formalized APRS messaging groups that correspond similarly to the JS8Call groups already listed in the GhostNet plan. APRS already gets good coverage with its existing distribution of digipeaters and igates, and there are numerous standalone handheld and Bluetooth KISS TNC solutions that allow for low power operation in the field with a variety of devices.

@shithubsucks
Copy link

Even though there was a G5 storm, it only completely blacked out HF for an hour or two at a time. The highly robust forward error correction and narrow bandwidth of js8 in SLOW mode was able to punch through to a decent number of stations during this event in my testing.

I don't see this as a huge issue especially given how rare theses events are.

@flakvest
Copy link

flakvest commented Jun 8, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants