You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the slides, you mentioned that all-reduces are decomposed into reduce-scatter and all-gather. So basically, it costs double of those ops. However, in XLA on TPU, the reduce-scatter is often implemented with all-reduce and dynamic-slice which suggests the opposite way where all-reduce is much faster than reduce-scatter. Can you explain the differences?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the slides, you mentioned that all-reduces are decomposed into reduce-scatter and all-gather. So basically, it costs double of those ops. However, in XLA on TPU, the reduce-scatter is often implemented with all-reduce and dynamic-slice which suggests the opposite way where all-reduce is much faster than reduce-scatter. Can you explain the differences?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: