-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Confusing claim about HashMap in no_std #274
Comments
333: Remove incorrect claim HashMap is avail in no_std r=adamgreig a=cameronelliott This should fix and clear up #274, which has driven me crazy a few times. Co-authored-by: Cameron Elliott <[email protected]>
It is worth noting this page says the reason HM is not available is due to a lack of a secure random number generator: |
That statement is not quite right. There's no |
@therealprof did you by chance look at the PR I submitted? Maybe you have some suggestions or improvement ideas for another PR? It actually sounds like a good idea to mention Hashbrown in that section of the docs. |
I did have a look. I would recommend making two more changes:
|
This section claims the existence of a
collections
crate which can provideVec
andHashMap
implementations.I don't believe such a crate exists. Nothing comes up in crates.io.
Vec
is provided byalloc
crate, butHashMap
is not.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: