You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is an aspect of binary source models that seems a bit strange for me know, but I see that it could be "it's user's reponsibility" approach. The issue is that we can define a binary source model and provide just a single value of rho, which is then shared by both source (as a parameter without _1 or _2). Example code:
Is is our intention? Of course, if one provides rho_1 it applies only to the first source. @jenniferyee What do you think? I'm bringing this up right now because similar issue appears in xallarap models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
After discussing with @jenniferyee in person: this should give an error. Similarly, ModelParameters({'t_0': 1, 't_E': 10, 'u_0_1': 0.2, 'u_0_2': 0.1}) should give an error because there should be t_0_1 and t_0_2.
For xallarap and single luminous source, the parameters should be rho or t_star, i.e., without _1.
There is an aspect of binary source models that seems a bit strange for me know, but I see that it could be "it's user's reponsibility" approach. The issue is that we can define a binary source model and provide just a single value of
rho
, which is then shared by both source (as a parameter without_1
or_2
). Example code:gives following output:
Is is our intention? Of course, if one provides
rho_1
it applies only to the first source.@jenniferyee What do you think? I'm bringing this up right now because similar issue appears in xallarap models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: