Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reimplement elastic-search and open-search sink with rust sdk #17443

Closed
wenym1 opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #17746
Closed

reimplement elastic-search and open-search sink with rust sdk #17443

wenym1 opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #17746

Comments

@wenym1
Copy link
Contributor

wenym1 commented Jun 25, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

To support async truncation on es sink for #17095, it's better to reimplement es sink with rust sdk, which provides async functionality.

Currently, though data is written with java sdk, the json index is already built with rust code, so there should not involve too much work of extra development.

elastic-search: https://docs.rs/elasticsearch/latest/elasticsearch/
open-search: https://docs.rs/opensearch/latest/opensearch/#structs

Describe the solution you'd like

No response

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the release-1.10 milestone Jun 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 5, 2024

This issue has been open for 60 days with no activity.

If you think it is still relevant today, and needs to be done in the near future, you can comment to update the status, or just manually remove the no-issue-activity label.

You can also confidently close this issue as not planned to keep our backlog clean.
Don't worry if you think the issue is still valuable to continue in the future.
It's searchable and can be reopened when it's time. 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants