You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The current batch_parallelism doesn't affect batch scan parallelism. The batch scan parallelism always equals to the stream parallelism of the table.
It's not always proper to change stream parallelism in order to get an ideal batch scan parallelism. Some downsides are:
it brings more memory footprints in compute node.
it results larger checkpoint size which impair storage compaction performance.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add a session variable batch_scan_parallelism. If set, it takes precedence.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The current
batch_parallelism
doesn't affect batch scan parallelism. The batch scan parallelism always equals to the stream parallelism of the table.It's not always proper to change stream parallelism in order to get an ideal batch scan parallelism. Some downsides are:
Describe the solution you'd like
Add a session variable
batch_scan_parallelism
. If set, it takes precedence.Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: