You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some user meet a problem which is the meta-node use too much CPU resource (nearly 100%, one whole core), and hummock manager can not generate compact task in time.
optimize ETCD (SQL-Backend) transaction cost , batch several compact task for once ETCD. Maybe SQL-Backend could solve part of this problem. But in current implementation, all operations of HummockManager would acquire the same lock and update the same key in ETCD, So it is still important to batch operations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been open for 60 days with no activity.
If you think it is still relevant today, and needs to be done in the near future, you can comment to update the status, or just manually remove the no-issue-activity label.
You can also confidently close this issue as not planned to keep our backlog clean.
Don't worry if you think the issue is still valuable to continue in the future.
It's searchable and can be reopened when it's time. 😄
Background
Some user meet a problem which is the meta-node use too much CPU resource (nearly 100%, one whole core), and hummock manager can not generate compact task in time.
Develop Task
HummockVersion
(feat(storage): replace hummock protobuf strcut with rust struct #15386)HummockManager
would acquire the same lock and update the same key in ETCD, So it is still important to batch operations.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: