-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 590
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perf: improve nexmark q8(EOWC) (w/ and w/o scaling up) performance #14986
Labels
Comments
10 tasks
lmatz
changed the title
perf: improve nexmark q8(EOWC) scaling up performance
perf: improve nexmark q8(EOWC) (scaling up) performance
Feb 4, 2024
lmatz
changed the title
perf: improve nexmark q8(EOWC) (scaling up) performance
perf: improve nexmark q8(EOWC) (w/ and w/o scaling up) performance
Feb 4, 2024
This issue has been open for 60 days with no activity. Could you please update the status? Feel free to continue discussion or close as not planned. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
nightly-20240127
4X:
1X:
RW 4X: 1659K
RW 1X: 592K (slower)
4X/1X Ratio: 2.8
Flink: http://metabase.risingwave-cloud.xyz/question/9549-nexmark-rw-vs-flink-avg-source-throughput-all-testbeds?rw_tag=nightly-20240127&flink_tag=v1.16.0&flink_label=flink-medium-1tm-test-20230104,flink-4x-medium-1tm-test-20240104&flink_metrics=avg-job-throughput-per-second
4X/1X Ratio: 3.16
RW:
Query Plan:
Dist Query Plan:
Flink:
Query Plan:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: