You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This question came up during the review for PR #247 :
Should we restrict the spectraData and spectraData<- methods to exclusively return/accept a DataFrame?
Some backends, specifically those that store the data in a data.frame or a database need to convert data to/from DataFrame which can be inefficient. Maybe it would be better to relax the definition in the MsBackend API to support more two-dimensional data structures such as data.frame, DataFrame (tibble?).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This question came up during the review for PR #247 :
Should we restrict the
spectraData
andspectraData<-
methods to exclusively return/accept aDataFrame
?Some backends, specifically those that store the data in a
data.frame
or a database need to convert data to/fromDataFrame
which can be inefficient. Maybe it would be better to relax the definition in theMsBackend
API to support more two-dimensional data structures such asdata.frame
,DataFrame
(tibble
?).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: