From 8f0c68a2c2b838703cf4ab86dac8f2575eefdd56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Reich Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 13:45:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Comment fix Co-authored-by: Antoine Beyeler <49431240+abey79@users.noreply.github.com> --- crates/viewer/re_viewer_context/src/viewer_context.rs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/crates/viewer/re_viewer_context/src/viewer_context.rs b/crates/viewer/re_viewer_context/src/viewer_context.rs index b1fafab25423..4ab832b84348 100644 --- a/crates/viewer/re_viewer_context/src/viewer_context.rs +++ b/crates/viewer/re_viewer_context/src/viewer_context.rs @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ impl<'a> ViewerContext<'a> { .unwrap_or_else(|| { // TODO(andreas): Is this operation common enough to cache the result? If so, here or in the reflection data? - // The nice thing about this would be that we could always give out references (but updating said cache wouldn't be easy in that case..) + // The nice thing about this would be that we could always give out references (but updating said cache wouldn't be easy in that case). let datatype = self .recording_store() .lookup_datatype(&component)